One of the most infamous financial events in recent memory would be the bursting of the internet bubble. However, this wasn’t the first time that events like this have happened in the markets.
How could something so catastrophic be allowed to happen over and over again?
The answer to this question can be found in what some people believe to be a hardwired human attribute: herd behavior, which is the tendency for individuals to mimic the actions (rational or irrational) of a larger group. Individually, however, most people would not necessarily make the same choice.
There are a couple of reasons why herd behavior happens. The first is the social pressure of conformity. You probably know from experience that this can be a powerful force. This is because most people are very sociable and have a natural desire to be accepted by a group, rather than be branded as an outcast. Therefore, following the group is an ideal way of becoming a member.
The second reason is the common rationale that it’s unlikely that such a large group could be wrong. After all, even if you are convinced that a particular idea or course or action is irrational or incorrect, you might still follow the herd, believing they know something that you don’t. This is especially prevalent in situations in which an individual has very little experience.
Herd behavior was exhibited in the late 1990s as investors were frantically investing huge amounts of money into internet-related companies, even though most of these dotcoms did not (at the time) have financially sound business models. The driving force that seemed to compel these investors to sink their money into such uncertain ventures was the reassurance they got from seeing so many others do the same thing.
A strong herd mentality can even affect financial professionals. The ultimate goal typically of a money manager is to follow an investment strategy to maximize a client’s invested wealth. The problem lies in the amount of scrutiny that money managers receive from their clients whenever a new investment fad pops up. For example, a wealthy client may have heard about an investment gimmick that’s gaining notoriety and inquires about whether the money manager employs a similar “strategy.”
In many cases, it’s tempting for a money manager to follow the herd of investment professionals. After all, if the aforementioned gimmick pans out, his clients will be happy. If it doesn’t, that money manager can justify his poor decision by pointing out just how many others were led astray.
Herd behavior, as the dotcom bubble illustrates, is usually not a very profitable investment strategy. Investors that employ a herd-mentality investment strategy constantly buy and sell their investment assets in pursuit of the newest and hottest investment trends. For example, if a herd investor hears that internet stocks are the “best” investments right now, they will potentially free up capital from a diversified portfolio to concentrate on internet stocks. If biotech stocks are all the rage six months later, they will probably move their money again.
Keep in mind that all this frequent buying and selling incurs transaction costs, which can eat away at available profits. Furthermore, it is extremely difficult to time trades correctly to ensure that you are entering your position right when the trend is starting. By the time a herd investor knows about the newest trend, most other investors have already taken advantage of this news, and the strategy’s wealth maximizing potential may have already peaked. This means that many herd-following investors will probably be entering into the game too late and are likely to lose money as those at the front of the pack move on to other strategies.
While it’s tempting to follow the newest investment trends, an investor is generally better off steering clear of the herd. Just because everyone is jumping on a certain investment “bandwagon” doesn’t necessarily mean the strategy is correct. Therefore, the soundest advice is to always do your homework before following any trend.
Just remember that particular investments favored by the herd can become overvalued because the investment’s high values are usually based on optimism and not on the underlying fundamentals.
Investing involves risk, including possible loss of principal.
AMG Distributors, Inc., is a member of FINRA/SIPC.
The concept of anchoring draws upon the tendency for us to attach or "anchor" our thoughts around a reference point despite the fact that it may not have any logical relevance to the decision at hand.Read More
Seeing is not necessarily believing as we also have confirmation and hindsight biases. Confirmation bias refers to how people tend to be more attentive to new information that confirms their own preconceived opinions about a subject. The hindsight bias represents how people believe after the fact, the occurrence of an event was completely obvious.Read More
When it comes to probability, a lack of understanding can lead to incorrect assumptions and predictions about the onset of events. One of these incorrect assumptions is called the gambler’s fallacy.Read More
You are now leaving the AMG Funds web site: The link you have selected is located on another web site. Please click OK below to leave the AMG Funds site and proceed to the selected site. AMG Funds does not endorse this web site, its sponsor, or any of the policies, activities, products or services offered on the site, or by any advertiser on the site. AMG Funds has no control of the content or data shown on this site, and while AMG Funds has no reason to doubt the reliability of the data shown, its accuracy is not guaranteed. Furthermore, AMG Funds takes no responsibility for the accuracy or factual correctness of any information posted to third party web sites.
Thank you for your interest in AMG Funds.OK